Author Topic: Tight quarters?  (Read 4487 times)

Offline Chuckster

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
Tight quarters?
« on: May 12, 2009, 04:10:59 PM »
Here's an article from the Daily News about a guy making the most of his 210 sq. ft. apartment in Manhattan.  I'd say that's he definitely space challenged.

He lives big in tiny digs: West Sider wins award for smallest, coolest pad
The Chuckster has spoken!

Offline CALIFORNIA

  • Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 72
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2009, 08:55:47 AM »
I had to laugh becuase I pay exaclty the same for rent ($1,550) and I have a bedroom with a door, a huge living room, a nice kitchen, big windows, a modern bathroom, hardwood floors, room for guests, a cool neighborhood, a 17 minute commute to midtown, and, best of all, big lion statues guarding the entrance to my building.  I lived in Manhattan for 3 years and then finally got wise and moved to Jackson Heights.
C A L I F O R N I A

Offline Chuckster

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2009, 11:55:29 AM »
I have a bedroom with a door...

California, when you put it that way, I can't help but think of a door as an amenity.

In my opinion, the apartment featured in the article is much too small.  It's cute and all that, but I would imagine that it would take lots of getting used to.  Picture having to rearrange your stuff in order to accommodate friend/family visits?

Just recently I had a good part of the floors in my apartment worked on, so my husband and I basically had to move a lot of furniture into two bedrooms.  It was a task maneuvering ourselves through the rooms because we had to climb over stuff, etc.  To make a long story short, this whole project had us on edge, so I can't see myself living in such a tiny space unless I had no other options of course.  From reading the article, I can only conclude that this guy may have options.  It's a good thing that he's crafty and makes the space work for him.
The Chuckster has spoken!

Offline Chuckster

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2009, 07:22:51 PM »
Here another story of a tiny apartment in Manhattan.  This one is only 175 sq. ft. and was purchased recently for $150,000.

Cozy-crazy couple makes tight all right in the city's tiniest studio
The Chuckster has spoken!

Offline Shelby2

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 4955
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2009, 07:40:49 PM »
I guess it's great if it works for them, but there are a bunch of things in that article that seem really strange to me beyond just having a small apartment.  I don't understand their system of picking up their work clothes on their way into work every day.  Is this because they don't have a closet at home?  I just can't really get how that would work.  Also, the idea of not owning a trash can and having to go out to the trash chute every time you want to thrown away anything, like a tissue, is weird.  The whole thing is weird....but hey, a chacun son gout!

Offline Chuckster

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2009, 07:50:04 PM »
I guess it's great if it works for them, but there are a bunch of things in that article that seem really strange to me beyond just having a small apartment.  I don't understand their system of picking up their work clothes on their way into work every day.  Is this because they don't have a closet at home?  I just can't really get how that would work.  Also, the idea of not owning a trash can and having to go out to the trash chute every time you want to thrown away anything, like a tissue, is weird.  The whole thing is weird....but hey, a chacun son gout!

The clothing thing is odd, but I can only imagine that closet space is absolutely out of the question in such a tiny space.  From reading the article, it appears as if they don't have a closet...that would explain the daily morning visits to the dry cleaners.  The wife does say she has a back-up plan by keeping some items at her job.  Their whole set-up would be too stressful for me to endure.

I have a friend that recently gave up an apartment on the corner of 110th Street and Amsterdam Avenue.  It was a large 4 bedroom that had 2 additional rooms as servants' quarters.  These rooms are tiny, so the fact that someone converted something similar into individual apartments is amazing.  I guess there's a market for that.
The Chuckster has spoken!

Offline Marlene

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 1831
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2009, 07:51:41 PM »
I hate the idea of having to step out of the apartment to change my mind!!!!!!  LOL

Offline Chuckster

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2009, 07:52:24 PM »
I hate the idea of having to step out of the apartment to change my mind!!!!!!  LOL

 :2funny: :2funny: :2funny:
The Chuckster has spoken!

Offline Shelby2

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 4955
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2009, 10:22:58 PM »
This is from a few years ago - it's about the Apartmenttherapy couple's rented 265 sq foot apartment that they renovated and continued to live in with their new baby.  Wonder if they moved out when the baby became a toddler!

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/16/garden/16baby.html

Offline Shelby2

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 4955
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2009, 02:59:26 PM »
This couple has only 50 square feet more than the couple in Morningside Heights, who keep their clothing at the dry cleaner and don't have a trash can.  I wonder why it seems like so much more than an extra 50 square feet. http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/09/02/realestate/20070902_HABI_SLIDESHOW_index.html

Offline Chuckster

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2009, 04:33:24 PM »
It probably has do with perspective and camera angles.  This is commonly used when photographing apartments that are for sale.
The Chuckster has spoken!

Offline dssjh

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 5314
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2009, 07:55:50 PM »
i could never ever do that.... :o

i grew up in a 700 square foot space with my mom and grandma and never really knew it was cramped because everyone else around had the same sort of living environment. when i got into my older teens and broadened my horizons, i made a promise to myself that i would always value space above all else. so when i moved out on my own at 17-18, i lived in a series of really big places in really bad areas -- a huge three bedroom off avenue D in the far far east village, a three bedroom in bed-stuy, a really big two bedroom right on newtown creek in a crappy part of greenpoint.

i've been fortunate enough to maintain big spaces since, although i've been in nicer realms -- astoria, then two places in JH. i cannot imagine cutting my living space by 80 percent for the "convenience" of living in a part of manhattan that's as far from midtown as we are!

Offline Shelby2

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 4955
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #12 on: December 14, 2009, 02:10:18 PM »
More of NYC's smallest living quarters from the Post - these are 55 sq ft, 90 sq ft and 105 sq ft.  One woman's kitchen sink is so small, she has to do her dishes in the shower and one guy's shower is so small, he can't turn around in it.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/small_price_to_pay_yk3QVpgdWYWTBnEhJ0QPXN

Offline Shelby2

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 4955
    • View Profile
Re: Tight quarters?
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2010, 10:03:14 AM »
NY Time's Home and Garden section did a feature on a 178 sq foot apartment in Clinton Hill

A Roomy 178 Square Feet

THE tins of seasoning on top of Zach Motl’s refrigerator — Old Bay, Hungarian paprika, Madras curry powder — are for show only, chosen for their graphic punch and nifty typefaces. Living in a room that’s only 178 square feet, you don’t want to cook much, Mr. Motl said; it’s just too odoriferous. He once made French onion soup, and the apartment smelled for four days. “It was gross,” he said.

Mr. Motl, a junior designer at Robert Couturier & Associates, has a sailor’s sense of thrift and handiness. More Photos »
But Mr. Motl, 25, has made the most of this studio apartment in Clinton Hill, Brooklyn, which he rents for $944 a month, and has outfitted for about $2,500 in the three years since he moved to New York City. He has hewed to the old decorating dictum that says the more stuff you put in a room (albeit artfully arranged stuff), the bigger it seems. More really is more.

Click link for full article and slide show