Author Topic: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times  (Read 10387 times)

Offline dssjh

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 5314
    • View Profile
Re: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times
« Reply #30 on: May 23, 2015, 02:44:21 AM »
Jackson Heights is nice, but I like Bayside, Fresh Meadows, and Forest Hills much better.

I believe you've mentioned that before. Fascinating.

Offline JDinJH

  • Activist
  • *****
  • Posts: 165
    • View Profile
Re: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times
« Reply #31 on: May 23, 2015, 09:01:28 AM »
I recently moved to a 3 bedroom in JH.  We could have moved to any neighborhood in Queens, i.e., very large downpayment, very large household income, spouses both have advanced degrees, and no debt. We chose JH because it is way closer to the City than Forest Hills (five or six extra stops on the local line - sometimes the express goes local) and FH is too close to the Boulevard of Death (we have kids).  Bayside is nice, but then you have to buy a car and pay for the long Island Rail Road in addition to the MetroCard.  Additionally, JH offers far more dining in terms of ethnic restaurants and you don't need a car.  (Aside: we had to live in Queens because it was close to extended family who play a role in providing childcare.)

As compared to Astoria and LIC, JH is far less expensive/reasonable and the historic district's character makes it a special place.  I wanted a 3-bedroom, but did not want to spend over a million dollars.

LIC is pretty awesome - nice parks and cool bars - but the 3-bedrooms are ridiculously expensive.  Astoria is pretty nice, but the housing stock is disorganized and it only has access to local train lines.  Sunnyside is pretty awesome, but the 7 train is unreliable.

JH has the best options in terms of housing and transportation and most importantly offers the best bargain - at least for now.

JH's diversity is a big fat plus - it keeps life interesting in terms of people watching and exposure to different culture, i.e., food and entertainment.

On that note, I am not surprised the NY Times did an article on my news neighborhood.

Offline MinorIon

  • Resident
  • ***
  • Posts: 45
    • View Profile
Re: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times
« Reply #32 on: May 24, 2015, 09:02:30 AM »
Very nice photos in the slideshow that goes with that article. Does a nice job of conveying a big part of what's interesting about the neighborhood.

Offline lindsey

  • Council Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 272
    • View Profile
Re: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times
« Reply #33 on: May 26, 2015, 01:10:45 PM »
We could have moved to any neighborhood in Queens, i.e., very large downpayment, very large household income, spouses both have advanced degrees, and no debt.

You forgot to mention which college you attended.

Offline lalochezia

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 818
    • View Profile
Re: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times
« Reply #34 on: May 26, 2015, 01:51:35 PM »
We could have moved to any neighborhood in Queens, i.e., very large downpayment, very large household income, spouses both have advanced degrees, and no debt.

You forgot to mention which college you attended.

http://bit.ly/1SulbWd


Offline sl

  • Council Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 444
    • View Profile
Re: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times
« Reply #36 on: May 31, 2015, 09:01:36 AM »
The main picture represents the JH i know on a day to day basis... but they chose to make the rest of the pictures look 3rd world with the under the tracks roose ave pictures and the filthy lil india which I tend to avoid.

Yeah, looking at those pictures, one would assume no white people lives in Jackson Heights.

Offline theplanesland

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 620
    • View Profile
Re: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times
« Reply #37 on: May 31, 2015, 12:39:45 PM »
The main picture represents the JH i know on a day to day basis... but they chose to make the rest of the pictures look 3rd world with the under the tracks roose ave pictures and the filthy lil india which I tend to avoid.

Yeah, looking at those pictures, one would assume no white people lives in Jackson Heights.

According to http://maps.nyc.gov/census/, JH is 56% Hispanic, 17% white non-Hispanic, and 22% Asian. The breakdown of Asian people is 26% Indian, 15% Bangladeshi and 24% Chinese. Of Hispanic subgroups, 22% of Hispanic people here are Colombian, 22% Ecuadorian, 18% Mexican, 10% Dominican.

So I wouldn't fault the photos for representing 83% of the neighborhood, if they do so.

Offline sl

  • Council Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 444
    • View Profile
Re: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times
« Reply #38 on: June 02, 2015, 10:55:05 PM »
The main picture represents the JH i know on a day to day basis... but they chose to make the rest of the pictures look 3rd world with the under the tracks roose ave pictures and the filthy lil india which I tend to avoid.

Yeah, looking at those pictures, one would assume no white people lives in Jackson Heights.

According to http://maps.nyc.gov/census/, JH is 56% Hispanic, 17% white non-Hispanic, and 22% Asian. The breakdown of Asian people is 26% Indian, 15% Bangladeshi and 24% Chinese. Of Hispanic subgroups, 22% of Hispanic people here are Colombian, 22% Ecuadorian, 18% Mexican, 10% Dominican.

So I wouldn't fault the photos for representing 83% of the neighborhood, if they do so.

Wow, only 17% ?

Offline lalochezia

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 818
    • View Profile
Re: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times
« Reply #39 on: June 03, 2015, 11:23:43 AM »
The main picture represents the JH i know on a day to day basis... but they chose to make the rest of the pictures look 3rd world with the under the tracks roose ave pictures and the filthy lil india which I tend to avoid.

Yeah, looking at those pictures, one would assume no white people lives in Jackson Heights.

According to http://maps.nyc.gov/census/, JH is 56% Hispanic, 17% white non-Hispanic, and 22% Asian. The breakdown of Asian people is 26% Indian, 15% Bangladeshi and 24% Chinese. Of Hispanic subgroups, 22% of Hispanic people here are Colombian, 22% Ecuadorian, 18% Mexican, 10% Dominican.

So I wouldn't fault the photos for representing 83% of the neighborhood, if they do so.

I think there is a disconnect between what some  people on this blog envisage the area of “Jackson Heights” to be. I assume (but could be wrong!!) that most people are talking about places close to either the 74th or 82nd st subway stops.

According to the city’s demographic data, JH extends from roosevelt all the way up to the grand central parkway. and from 69th into the mid 90’s.

I’d be interested in the relative and absolute demographics (both compared to the city’s JH definition and the city as a whole) of the historic district.

Offline eddie

  • Activist
  • *****
  • Posts: 235
    • View Profile
Re: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times
« Reply #40 on: June 03, 2015, 11:56:21 AM »
The main picture represents the JH i know on a day to day basis... but they chose to make the rest of the pictures look 3rd world with the under the tracks roose ave pictures and the filthy lil india which I tend to avoid.

Yeah, looking at those pictures, one would assume no white people lives in Jackson Heights.

According to http://maps.nyc.gov/census/, JH is 56% Hispanic, 17% white non-Hispanic, and 22% Asian. The breakdown of Asian people is 26% Indian, 15% Bangladeshi and 24% Chinese. Of Hispanic subgroups, 22% of Hispanic people here are Colombian, 22% Ecuadorian, 18% Mexican, 10% Dominican.

So I wouldn't fault the photos for representing 83% of the neighborhood, if they do so.

Link didn't work for me, is that current or is that from 2010 census?

I just think JH gets sold very short when they only show under the tracks on Roosevelt and of course Little India section. Most would agree that Roose ave is an eyesore for this neighborhood. And Little India is unkept. The fact is that is not where most of us actually live, that is a transit hub and little india a shopping area.

It just seems lazy to only show those two spots and that's what most articles focus on.

Offline Shelby2

  • Mayor
  • *******
  • Posts: 4955
    • View Profile
Re: Jackson Heights featured in Today's New York Times
« Reply #41 on: June 03, 2015, 07:55:38 PM »

I’d be interested in the relative and absolute demographics (both compared to the city’s JH definition and the city as a whole) of the historic district.

The only way I know of to figure this out is to get the census figures from each census tract in the historic district and add them up.  I don't think it would be that time consuming.  Just go here http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/map and zoom in using the zoom tool, hover over each tract in the historic district and do the math.  One thing is that might make it harder is the tracts may not line up exactly with the historic district boundaries, so you probably have to estimate.

Also, the figures are from 2010 and I'm sure things have changed some since then.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2015, 08:00:39 PM by Shelby2 »