Yes, please do think about this before you vote. This post frames the situation to seem that Eric Schneiderman wants terrorists to have chemical or biological weapons, and that is simply not true. The article also states that "He sided with the New York Civil Liberties Union, which argued that antiterrorism policy should be set at the federal level." To insinuate Eric Schneiderman wants terrorists to have weapons of this kind, because of his vote, is pure propaganda. I encourage everyone to look deeper into his vote and see what the reasoning really is. Don't buy into talking points.
Here is why I will be voting for Eric tomorrow:
He is strongly Pro-Choice, Pro-Wall-Street Regulation, Pro-Social Justice, Pro-Environmental Justice, Pro-Marriage Equality and Women's and Minority Rights, not to mention Pro-Interdependence as a matter of principle. His Republican opponent is running with a seemingly very racist, sexist and wealthy Tea-Partier, and Eric's opponent is personally Anti-Choice, doesn't want to regulate Wall Street corruption, and is against Equal Rights for the LGBT community.
He has worked hard for progressive justice and a truly interdependent set of government policies, from repealing the horrible Rockefeller Drug laws to supporting the LGBT community and Marriage equality to Health Care Reform to actually trying to tax multimillionaires at something approaching a fair rate of contribution.
However, please don't take my (or earbears') word for it. Look up the facts and make your decision for yourself!
Topic: Schneiderman votes against terrorism bills! (Read 1525 times)